Security · Comparison

Bug bounty vs penetration testing

Both pay outside experts to find weaknesses before criminals do. A penetration test is a scheduled, scoped engagement that ends in a report; a bug bounty is a standing invitation that pays for each valid finding.

2 options · 8 questions side by side · updated

CompareBug bountyPenetration testing
Who testsMany independent researchersA small team from one firm
WhenContinuously, while the programme runsA fixed window of days or weeks
How you payPer valid finding, plus platform feesA fixed fee per engagement
CoverageWhatever researchers choose to look atEverything in the agreed scope, methodically
OutputSeparate reports as bugs are foundOne formal report with severities and fixes
For audits and clientsRarely enough on its ownThe usual evidence they ask for
NoiseMany duplicate or low-value reportsLow, since testers filter their own findings
Best stageMature products that can fix quicklyBefore launch and after big changes

How to choose between Bug bounty and Penetration testing

  • Start with a penetration test before a first launch, or when customers or auditors need a report.
  • Add a bug bounty once the basics are fixed and someone can triage and patch reports within days.
  • Many teams run both: regular pentests for depth, and a bounty or disclosure policy for everything in between.

The options

More comparisons

Crafted in the dark. Shipped to the world.

Tell us what you are building. You get a private project space with a proposal and a line-by-line quote within a day.