Backend and APIs · Comparison

Node.js vs Deno vs Bun

Three runtimes for JavaScript and TypeScript on the server. Much of the same code runs on all three; they differ in built-in tools, security defaults, speed and how long each has been used in production.

3 options · 8 questions side by side · updated

CompareNode.jsDenoBun
What it isThe original server-side JavaScript runtimeA runtime with safe defaults and built-in toolsRuntime, package manager and bundler in one
EngineV8 (from Chrome), written in C++V8, with a core written in RustJavaScriptCore (from Safari), written in Zig
TypeScriptRuns plain TypeScript by stripping typesBuilt inBuilt in
Security defaultsFull access unless its permission model is onNo file, network or env access without flagsFull access, like Node.js
npm packagesThe native home of npmMost work, since Deno 2Most work, with some gaps
Built-in toolsTest runner and watch modeFormatter, linter, test runner, compilerPackage manager, bundler, test runner
In use since20092020 (version 1.0)2023 (version 1.0)
Best forProduction apps that need the widest supportNew TypeScript projects and edge functionsFast installs, tests and fresh projects

How to choose between Node.js, Deno and Bun

  • Pick Node.js for production systems where compatibility, hosting options and hiring matter most.
  • Pick Deno for new TypeScript projects that want built-in tooling and permission checks, or for Deno-based platforms such as Supabase Edge Functions.
  • Pick Bun to speed up installs, tests and scripts, and test dependencies carefully before running it in production.

The options

More comparisons

Crafted in the dark. Shipped to the world.

Tell us what you are building. You get a private project space with a proposal and a line-by-line quote within a day.