Backend platforms · Comparison

Supabase vs Firebase

The two backend platforms most often weighed against each other. Both give you a database, sign-in, storage and functions; the difference starts with the database: PostgreSQL tables against Firestore documents.

2 options · 9 questions side by side · updated

CompareSupabaseFirebase
DatabasePostgreSQL (relational tables)Firestore (documents in collections)
QueryingSQL, joins and an auto-generated REST APISDK queries, no joins
Access rulesRow level security policies in SQLSecurity rules in their own language
Live updatesBroadcast, presence and table changesBuilt into Firestore listeners
Offline supportNot built inBuilt into the mobile and web SDKs
Server codeEdge Functions (TypeScript on Deno)Cloud Functions (Node.js or Python)
Open sourceYes, and it can be self-hostedNo
PricingFree plan; Pro from $25 a month plus usageFree quotas, then pay per operation (Blaze)
Lock-inLow: standard PostgresHigh: proprietary APIs and data model

How to choose between Supabase and Firebase

  • Pick Supabase for relational data, SQL, predictable plans and an exit path through standard Postgres.
  • Pick Firebase for mobile apps that need offline sync, push notifications and Google's wider toolset.
  • Both are quick to start with, so the choice mostly follows the shape of your data.

The options

More comparisons

Crafted in the dark. Shipped to the world.

Tell us what you are building. You get a private project space with a proposal and a line-by-line quote within a day.